|
Living Reliability: Principles and Learning
By
Robert J. Latino with contributing material provided by Charles
J. Latino
Reliability Center, Inc.
Abstract: The key to Reliability is more a
mind-set then the hard technologies that exist on the market
today. When we travel to conferences and shows for Reliability
we are inundated with vendors that supply technologies to
execute Reliability strategies. Such technologies are integral
to the ultimate success of a Reliability endeavor. However, if
the organization does not have the foresight and vision needed
at the executive level to set the stage, then the principles of
Reliability will likely not take hold enough to change the
culture. Does your organization practice the principle of
Reliability?
Think about what a different mental state Reliability is as
opposed to what we are used to. For decades we have battled the
issue of dealing with a reactive state. In the 20th
century we really started refining the technologies that would
allow us to detect impending failure earlier. We continue to
praise responders/fixers for minimizing the time to restore a
failed situation.
However, Reliability brings a whole reversal of this thought
process. True Reliability not only involves minimizing
consequences, but also seeking to understand what caused the
consequences to occur in the first place. We are not satisfied
with being the mechanic who cut down a repair time from 4 hours
to 30 minutes. A true Reliability practitioner will question
why the mechanic is getting so much practice.
From a conceptual standpoint point, Reliability is responsible
for tomorrow and Maintenance is responsible for today. This is
why a Reliability group could would not likely be successful if
subordinate to a Maintenance department. In most cases when we
see this, the Reliability Engineers (RE) inevitably end up doing
maintenance engineering tasks and do little Reliability work.
On the organizational chart, Reliability should be lateral to
Maintenance, no subordinate. Instead of sharpening our skills
to respond, we will strive to understand why a response is
needed.
We
can all relate to the hard technology tools like vibration
monitoring, motor circuit testing, infrared thermography,
ultrasonic thickness testing, rotor dynamic testing, finite
element analysis, etc. All of these tools seek out a signal of
some sort and try to “predict” when something will fail. This
provides invaluable information to minimize the potential
consequences of the impending event by taking corrective actions
early. However, if the infrastructure is not there to provide
the manpower, training, funding, policies, procedures, etc, then
the value of the hard technologies cannot be realized.
Charles J. Latino recently received the first ever Summit Award
(May 29, 2005) at the Maintenance and Reliability Technology
Summit (MARTS) in Chicago. This award was to recognize his 50
year lifetime contribution to the field of Reliability. In
conversations with Charles about what he really felt were the
key principles of Reliability, he mentioned the following:
-
Beyond age 45 get a comprehensive physical every year and
practice Preventive Maintenance (PM) principles on yourself
by properly eating and exercising.
-
Assign subordinates to tasks that they have the training and
desire to perform. People who WANT to do something are much
more effective than people that HAVE to do something.
-
Develop a reputation for outstanding performance and then
use that reputation as political capital to advance your
larger ideas.
-
Find ways to exploit the successes of your group through
available advertising and marketing channels (i.e. –
newsletters, speaking at conferences, magazine articles,
on-line articles, etc.)
-
Wrap big ideas in “bold and outrageous” packages to
stimulate dialogue.
-
You will prosper by making important people look good.
Recognize that others may take full or partial credit for
your accomplishments but they themselves will know who is
really making them look good.
-
Learn how to think like the people that you must gain
acceptance from. Be smart and strategize how to move those
who are stuck in their restraining paradigms.
-
Make training as realistic as possible. Present each idea
in at least three different ways (i.e. – written, spoken,
practiced). Reinforce training with job aides provided to
the students.
-
Don’t be afraid to learn. Never be embarrassed by people
assuming that you are not up to par.
-
Surround yourself with smart people as your advisors. You
should not be expected to know everything.
-
Think bigger than the immediate situation. Always look at
what is possible from the big picture point-of-view.
-
Recognize that the small failures are the precursors to
larger, catastrophic ones. It is proactive to analyze them
with Root Cause Analysis and prevent their potential
consequences.
-
Have faith in your abilities as you will often face hurdles
that seem insurmountable. Your faith will carry you through
these hard times.
-
Have fun and enjoy the experience! Reliability is truly a
gratifying field when you are able to “challenge the
limits”.
Thinking in a Reliability mind-set is not just we do at work, it
is a life lesson. If we live these principles we will start to
view things differently in our personal lives. We will not
accept normal undesirable outcomes at face value and start to
understand why they happen and how to eliminate the risk of
recurrence. Simple things like; why an electrical outlet
doesn’t work, why the swing chain broke off, why a certain noise
in car appeared, why there is low flow from a faucet, why the
dryer is not drying properly, why the grass is dying in one area
of the lawn, why the bulbs in the lamp post seem to burn out
more frequently, will now spark our Reliability curiosity!
Is
Reliability a way of life for you? THINK! |