| Editors
note: This is the sixth article in a series of
articles by Dave Army and Ralph Hedding of
Strategic Asset
Management Inc.
Click
here to read Part 1: The
Identification of Work.
Click
here to read Part 2: Prioritization
Click
here to read Part 3: Long Range
Scheduling
Click
here to read Part 4: Look Ahead Scheduling
Click
here to read Part 5: Materials Management
Just
so we’re clear, when I discuss Preventive
Maintenance, I want to make sure that you don’t
think that I’m talking about some high tech approach
to solving all of your reliability problems.
I want to discuss PM within the context of
Stage 1, or “Core Maintenance” competencies.
All
too often, Companies and alas, managers want to go
right to the pinnacle of reliability technology.
They go out and beg borrow or steal predictive
technologies, condition monitoring, RCFA (Root Cause
Failure Analysis) RCM (Reliability Centered
Maintenance) and any other myriad or Stage 3 and 4
techniques. In
fact, you probably already know about these tools and,
if you don’t already own them, have been casting an
eye at them sort of the same way I look at the Sharper
Image Catalog around Christmas.
These
initiatives are all well and good, but remember, they
will generate new tasks for your maintenance staff.
If you’re well under control and planning and
executing work in accordance with long-range and
weekly schedules, then you may be ready for the “big
time.”
I
once remember visiting a client at a large generating
facility. They had a crew of people (4 of them) who’s only mission in
life was to conduct vibration, oil and thermal
analysis of rotating equipment and switchgear.
One day I sat down and talked with the lead.
He told me all the great things they were doing
and finding out. When I asked him what they were doing with the results, he
sadly stated that “very little” was being done.
No one had the time or resources to act on his
findings. After
all, the equipment wasn’t broken yet!
I concluded my visit by asking the manager why
he didn’t reassign those 4 valuable resources, since
no one did anything with their input, why waste
everyone’s time? A perfectly logical question, from my point of view.
At
another plant, I was told that they (the maintenance
organization) were fully involved in an oil analysis
program with one of their suppliers.
Samples were dutifully taken for analysis, sent
to the supplier and then analyzed.
The results were then sent back to the site and
filed by the Maintenance Clerk, never to see the light
of day again. With
nothing better to do, I asked to look at these files.
After a few hours of review, I noticed the iron
content was getting higher and higher in one of the
ball mills. Hmmmmm,
what could this be indicating.
Over lunch, I mentioned my observation to the
Maintenance superintendent.
Lo and behold the offending mill was scheduled
for a major inspection the next week. Results, a damaged gearbox that was getting ready to fail
catastrophically.
What
does all of this prove?
Well, to me, it points out that in order to
make the finer points of PM work, you’ve got to be
in touch with the Stage 1 basics.
When you are comfortable with planning,
scheduling and executing that schedule, it makes it
possible to add new activities to your list, without
interrupting schedule.
Most condition monitoring and predictive
activities identify degradations in equipment of
systems, prior to failure.
Therefore, there is ample time to plan,
schedule and execute, prior to failure.
That’s why we do it.
Click
here for more Planning & Scheduling Resources and
Links
Click
here for more Maintenance Management Resources and
Links |