Focal Points: Sponsored links

MRO-Zone.com - Maintenance Focused Search Engine

Find a Reliabilityweb.com Maintenance Conference
iPresentation Tutorials - quick lessons from experts
ReliabilityRadio.com - The Voice of Maintenance




Return to Home Page

Overall Equipment Effectiveness by Bob Hansen (Excerpt Chapter 6)
Win-Win Maintenance/Equipment Shutdown Strategies (Page 6)
Exploit.

The next step of a shutdown is to maximize the use of the key mechanics as much as possible. When the machine is down for 24 hours a day, the local workforce isn’t scheduled for even half of that downtime. However, if the machine is scheduled to be down for 12 hours or less, then the key mechanics can work for the majority or all of the planned downtime. This kind of scheduling improves both the use of the key mechanics and their work ratio relative to the length of machine down-time. It is equivalent to having a brief maintenance time put into the regular production schedule and executed as if it was a product run. If you stop the machine for the length of a shift, or less, then almost everyone has the opportunity to complete one shift of maintenance work without leaving the job site for rest. This concept is called maintenance linestop.

The chronology of an ideal maintenance linestop might have the following schedule. The machine shuts down at 7:00 A.M. and is left threaded with non-product slack web. This process may take 30 minutes. Maintenance begins executing a priority work list at 7 A.M. beginning with periphery equipment while the machine is threaded with non-product web.

They complete as much work as possible and taper down the job size near the end to be completed at 5:30 P.M. The next steps are clean-up and machine prep, followed by conveyance checkout; these take approximately 90 minutes. The machine startup with product is conducted at 7:00 P.M. Allowing 0.5 hours for lunch, the amount of work time a key mechanic has available is about 9 work hours, providing a work hour to linestop downtime ratio of 75 percent.

9 work hours
12 hours total

=.75 or 75%

This maintenance linestop approach is advantageous for low-risk, short-duration tasks that do not alter the existing process. It is perfect for both periodic maintenance (PM) and predictive maintenance (PdM) jobs as well as for modular replacement of bench tested (certified) subassemblies, which engages a spare part strategy.

For example, assume that twelve identical pumps are used in the machine and two spare pumps are stocked. Assume removing and replacing each pump requires 30 minutes and that rebuilding and testing a pump requires one hour.

With two long shutdowns, an annual PM strategy might be to overhaul five pumps during each shutdown by disassembly, replacing parts, reassembly, replacement and realignment in the machine, as well as modular replacement of one spare pump each shutdown. This approach saves one spare pump for infant mortality.

Next Page>      Page 1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8/9/10/11/12/13/14/15/16/17/18/19/20

Advertisement

Click here to return to Home Page

 
List Your Web Site Editorial Policy Privacy Policy Contact us
Feedback © Copyright 2000-2006 NetexpressUSA Inc. All rights reserved Terms of Service Trademark Notice