Focal Points: Sponsored links

MRO-Zone.com - Maintenance Focused Search Engine

Find a Reliabilityweb.com Maintenance Conference
iPresentation Tutorials - quick lessons from experts
ReliabilityRadio.com - The Voice of Maintenance




Return to Home Page

Overall Equipment Effectiveness by Bob Hansen (Excerpt Chapter 6)
Win-Win Maintenance/Equipment Shutdown Strategies (Page 7)
Removing and replacing the 12 pumps at 30 minutes each requires a total of 6 hours of shutdown time per year. With the above plan, five pumps will be rebuilt and tested during each of the two shut-downs, for another 10 hours. Thus, a total of 16 shutdown work hours is needed annually.

With frequent linestops, however, a pre-tested spare pump is substituted each time for the pump that will be overhauled. In turn, the actual reconditioning is completed external of shutdown time. Therefore, only the removing and replacing time is required for the twelve pumps annually, reducing the overall shutdown time for these pumps from 16 hours to 6 hours. Moving work items from internal to external is a quick changeover methodology for maintenance. See section 8.3. 

A review of the shutdown tasks revealed that a good portion of the work was periodic maintenance jobs of 6 hours or less, and numerous jobs were similar to the pump example above. This work was well defined and had a high probability of starting back up without problems.

A linestop strategy not only exploits the key mechanics work time, it also reduces the total annual internal shutdown work hours. In this case it was estimated about 15 percent of the internal work was reduced. This means about 15 percent of 16,000 work hours or 2,400 shutdown work hours was moved to external (non-shutdown time) work to be accomplished by key mechanics between linestops.

If nearly all PM type work was accomplished on maintenance linestops, then the shutdown work plan could focus all resources on the project and major overhaul maintenance items, increasing overall effectiveness.

With this strategy, the key was to find windows of opportunity to plan and schedule maintenance linestops. Because waste would be increased if production processes were stopped during a normal run, the best window of opportunity would be when a product changeover fell near the start of the day shift, Monday through Thursday. Linestops were anticipated each month and attempted to be fixed 24 hours in advance. When operating conditions caused the target changeover to be early or late, the linestop would be postponed to the next potential window of opportunity.

Next Page>      Page 1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8/9/10/11/12/13/14/15/16/17/18/19/20

Advertisement

Click here to return to Home Page

 
List Your Web Site Editorial Policy Privacy Policy Contact us
Feedback © Copyright 2000-2006 NetexpressUSA Inc. All rights reserved Terms of Service Trademark Notice