With
a maintenance linestop during the week, day mechanics
would be available as well as some of the resources
from nearby maintenance groups. Cooperation was needed
from the product schedulers to review their plans and
tentatively designate a maintenance linestop on some
frequent basis. As a trial, a maintenance linestop was
planned monthly with the goal to successfully have ten
per year.
An additional benefit results by
doing two internal actions in parallel. Because
a product changeover could be scheduled in conjunction
with the maintenance linestop, an additional 9 to 10
hours in product changeover time could be saved
annually. Therefore, linestops exploit machine
availability.
During each maintenance
linestop, key mechanics could work about 9 hours. With
30 key mechanic available at a time, each linestop
provided 30 X 9 hours = 270 internal work hours of
maintenance. The remaining key mechanics could not be
used; their time was reserved to support shifts before
and after the downtime. By borrowing a few mechanics
from other sources, about 306 hours of work could be
completed per maintenance linestop. Thus, monthly
maintenance linestops provided about 3060 hours of the
estimated annual hours. Figure 6-4 illustrates the
breakdown of a maintenance linestop.
From here, an overall vision of
short frequent shutdowns began to take shape. About
half of the original 16,000 total hours needed was
unique project work or major PMs. Each shutdown , the
critical path for one project would be selected as the
determining factor to set the length of a shutdown.
With proactive direction on projects, one of the
specification requirements was to design and fabricate
the hardware and software to be modular and capable of
installation in three days or less. Work that was
started during prior shutdowns could be completed with
the final installation or activation step completed at
the next shutdown. Short frequent shutdowns would
allow a focus on a few areas of the machine each time,
instead of trying to accomplish many things to all
parts of the machine. This narrower focus would also
simplify the conveyance and commissioning steps.
A short shutdown of 3.5 days
would have a good work ratio if the conveyance and
commissioning steps could be minimal. A planned
shut-down from 7:00 A.M. on Monday to 7:00 P.M. on
Thursday would total 84 hours. By focusing on just one
or two project areas of the machine, the conveyance
checkout time was reduced to two to three hours.