| Cost
Optimisation Algorithms
Another common
algorithm seeks to find the optimal task interval by
determining the minimum overall cost of maintenance.
It uses the formula below:
Ct=Cf
+Cpa +Csa
Where
- Ct is the product of
the cost of actual failure and the probability of
failure
- Cpa is the cost of
the primary maintenance action multiplied by the
analysis period divided by the frequency of the
primary maintenance action
- Csa is the cost of
the secondary action multiplied by the analysis
period divided by the frequency of primary action
multiplied by the probability of failure divided
by the period of analysis
The Impracticality
of Statistical Methods
The body of data
required to generate accurate numbers for the above
equations rarely exists in industry. For example:
- The value of T
itself can only be determined by running equipment
to absolute failure sufficient times to gain a
statistically significant sample - a practice that
is rarely justifiable.
- Determining the
probability of failure or MTBF is precluded for
similar reasons to determining T.
- There are no simple
and reliable methods for determining the task
effectiveness S.
- All the cost factors
in the formulae are subject to the vagueness of
the accounting and cost allocation methods
employed.
Whilst the formulae for
optimisation may be mathematically correct they are
practically useless for all but a few applications
where the variables can be determined with some
certainty. Furthermore, they require the employment of
people skilled in mathematics and statistics and hence
such approaches, when applied in industry can easily
develop into a back office pursuit of statistical
perfection and lead to a program completely out of
touch with reality.
Such programs have also
been responsible for the relentless pursuit of
accurate data that in reality takes decades of
consistent operation for it to be of any realistic use
as a tool for deriving maintenance task intervals˛.
˛ The
author understands that failure history is essential
for defect elimination however its use as a
determinant for maintenance task interval is widely
overstated in industry.
Click
here for page 3 |