Getting to the Point with Vibration Collection Data
We often hear about the need to acquire vibration measurements at precisely the same location each time we measure a point. Why is this important? In order for vibration measurements to be trendable they must be closely repeatable, and we need to eliminate measurement error. With high frequency measurements, the vibration attenuates rapidly as it travels away from its source. The author has seen readings vary by as much as 50% when the collection transducer was moved by as little as ¼ inch. If the transducer is not placed in the same location, the trended data will show an error that may be mistaken for a change in machine condition. When the collection point is different, the transmission path is either longer or shorter. This affects the amount of energy perceived by the transducer. Standing waves also exist in vibrating machinery. The transducer may sometimes be located at a nodal point of one of these waves; and if care isn’t taken in transducer placement, the next measurement may be at an anti-node. This is more apparent in larger machines because of the amount of surface area available for standing wave formation.
There are several ways to precisely mark data points for measurement with a magnet-mounted transducer. Paint, glue-on-pads, stud-mounted pads, machined surfaces, and dimples made by a small drill bit are all used with success. Best of all are permanently mounted coded attachment studs (such as Vibcode) that guarantee precise re-placement of the transducer every time, at the same location, angle and pressure. Regardless of the method employed, it is important to always precisely identify data collection points.
Tip provided by LUDECA, INC.
ALIGNMENT * VIBRATION * BALANCING
www.ludeca.com
305-591-8935
How fast is the data collection speed of your vibration data collector?
Previous tip: How is Vibration Described?
Next tip: Inconsistent Part Numbers and Descriptions Cause Part Shortages, and Delays in Repairs
« Back to all maintenance tips
Have your say
Related tips

- R300S for When Good Enough – Isn’t Enough!
- Belt/Sheave Alignment Laser, Custom Shim and Gaskets
- Join The Association For Maintenance Professionals
- Motor Testing Books
- New AT33IND Perfect for QC & Troubleshooting
- IR Windows: Compare and Save with Exiscan
- Reliability Centered Maintenance for SAP Plant Maintenance
- Job Postings for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals
- Total Productive Maintenance Books
- MRO Inventory and Purchasing Books
- Reliability Engineering Services
- GPAllied Inspired Training: Hard-Hitting, Impactful Courses and Workshops.
- Commtest - Affordable Vibration Analysis

- Things to think about (and do) in 2011
- Reliability Polls and Quizzes
- Risk Calculation Methodology
- Understanding & Comparing Risk
- Preventing Mechanical Failures - An Introduction to Failure Mode Identification
- Stress: The Silent Killer - Part 1 of a 2 part series
(2) - The Continuous Journey
- Reliability Quiz - MRO Storeroom Quiz
- Championing SAP Plant Maintenance at Your Organization
(1) - Q&A with the 2011 Uptime Award Winners
- Reliability Polls and Quizzes
- Things to think about (and do) in 2011
- Electric Motor Bearing Greasing Basics
(4) - Asset Management: concepts and practices
(8) - CBM 2011 Video Proceedings
(2) - Reliabilityweb.com 100 Top Web Sites
- Maintenance of Hydraulic Systems
(2) - Aerial Infrared – An Asset Management Tool for District Heating System Operators
- Root Cause Failure Analysis Web Workshops
- Things to think about (and do) in 2010
(30)

Comments (1)
I have often wondered why most VA monitoring programs take readings in 3 directions, in our program we take just 2 directions the radial and the axial direction? Most diagnostic charts refer to radial and axial readings so I have not seen any reference to significance of taking a triaxial reading so I'm not sure why the third direction is taken? Is there an explanation for this practice?
1) Posted 1:19 pm, 10 November 2010 by John Halley