How do you Determine Whether to Repair or Scrap an Electric Motor?
a. Is the motor greater than 25 horsepower? If the motor is greater than 25 horsepower, the first step would be to price a new motor, and compare it to the quote from the motor repair facility. If the quote to repair is 80% or more than the cost of the new motor, then it is better to purchase. History does play a part in this, as the experience with the motor shop weighs heavily in this decision. However, at 50% of the cost of a new motor or less, it is always better to repair than purchase. Good repair shops use VPI to prolong the life of an armature, and insulate the heat.
b. If the motor is less than 25 horsepower, it generally is better to purchase a new motor, with a warranty. However, there are some repair shops that specialize in small motor repair and stake their reputation on the quality of their work. It pays to investigate, if you have the time to do it. Due to the volume in industry, there is little time to devote to this task other than concentrate on replacing motors less than 25 horsepower.
Tip provided by Daniel DeWald, CPIM, GPAllied
Previous tip: Definition: Total Effective Equipment Performance (TEEP)
Next tip: Communicate Often and With a Plan…
« Back to all maintenance tips
Have your say
Related tips

- February 28
Motor Electrical Predictive Maintenance and Testing Training - March 19
RCM-2012 Reliability-Centered Maintenance and Root Cause Analysis Conference - April 17
Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) and Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS) Summit - April 24
Asset Operations Excellence Master Class and the Manufacturing Game - May 1
Focused Change Management for Reliability Initiatives and the Reliability Game - May 15
AM-2012 Asset Management Forum - June 5
CBM-2012 Condition Monitoring and Predictive Maintenance Forum - July 23
Infrared Level I Certification Course - October 3
Maintenance Strategy Master Class Level 1 - October 9
Focused Change Management for Reliability Initiatives and the Reliability Game

- Total Productive Maintenance Books
- Job Postings for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals
- Join The Association For Maintenance Professionals
- Belt/Sheave Alignment Laser, Custom Shim and Gaskets
- MRO Inventory and Purchasing Books
- Reliability Engineering Services
- Motor Testing Books
- R300S for When Good Enough – Isn’t Enough!
- Commtest - Affordable Vibration Analysis
- Reliability Centered Maintenance for SAP Plant Maintenance
- GPAllied Inspired Training: Hard-Hitting, Impactful Courses and Workshops.
- New AT33IND Perfect for QC & Troubleshooting
- IR Windows: Compare and Save with Exiscan


Comments (3)
1) Posted 8:49 am, 29 July 2010 by Jack Nicholas
2) Posted 8:54 am, 29 July 2010 by Bob McCann
Next comes efficiency, the repair vs replace decision to make once the MTBF hurdle is reached is about ROI. Will the difference in cost vs difference in efficiency pay out over the expected MTBF of the motor. Simple calculations that have to be updated periodically. Forget the old rule of thumb: 3 rebuilds and you are out. Verify the core loss condition before you even start to rebuild.
The motor size issue has to take into account the fixed costs of handling and administration. If we are talking standard mill motors, then 25 to 50 hp is a noraml cut range. iHowever in the discrete manufacturing business it is not uncommon to routinely repair fractional hp servos, but again it is an economic decision.
The best motor repair is the one you never have to make. So always practice precision installation methods, have a well engineered and delivered lubrication program, appropriate PMs, and a WELL DESIGNED PdM PROGRAM. Good PdM alone (with appropriate decision making) can reduce the cost of motor repairs by 50% even if the basic MTBF isn't changed. why replace a bearing, when you could have fixed the misalignment? Why replace a shaft or rotor, when a simple bearing change in the early failure stages would have dealt with it?
I hope this adds to Dan's excellent article.
- Sam McNair, LCE
3) Posted 10:54 am, 29 July 2010 by Sam McNair