Visite nuestro sitio en Español: Confiabilidad.net    RSS | Contact

Run To Failure As A Maintenance Strategy

June 29, 2010
(Reliability-Centered Maintenance)

In the maintenance and reliability world we spend much of our time thinking and planning out ways to better maintain or redesign some equipment to make it last longer or be more reliable.  However, there are situations where a reliable solution or maintenance plan is not cost effective and the recommendation is to “run to failure”.

For mission critical equipment that is evaluated as a “run to failure” candidate, you need to have a plan.  The plan should include everything that is required to make the failure event as painless as possible, including identification of the skills, tools, materials, emergency procedures, etc. necessary to correct the event.

For example, one of my project’s has three emergency generator’s that all need to start and synchronize when a power failure occurs.  We test these every month by shutting off the power to the plant and twice in the past 10 years, the equipment has failed to synchronize and bring the power back up during a test.  This is a relatively infrequent failure, however, if generators don’t provide power within 10 minutes there could be an environmental impact.  Manually synchronizing the generator’s is possible and, with proper training, not difficult.  So our solution was to plan for the failure and build staff skills to handle it.  The planning included developing very clear written instructions that included color coded plaques to identify the steps.  In addition, a cross training program was put in place with annual refreshers to train and confirm that the designated staff do know the procedures to synchronize the generators.

Planning for a failure is much like preparing a race car pit crew.  before the race, they put a great deal of effort into maintaining and preparing the car for reliable operation.  During the race they have trained and prepared with spare parts, tools, and equipment to quickly deal with a “run to failure” when it happens.  In my maintenance organization we do a great job of doing preventive and predictive maintenance and we have a great Reliability Centered Maintenance program which has improved reliability. Now we just need to prepare and train a pit crew to handle our critical “run to failures”.

Reader tip provided by Marc W. Yarlott, P.E., Project Engineer - Asset Management, Veolia Water North America, Lincoln City, Oregon

Mr. Yarlott is project engineering with Veolia Water providing maintenance program design. His special interest is in evaluating and identifying mission critical systems. Click here to find out more on his blog

Thanks for the Tip Mark - Your Reliabilityweb.com Elements T Shirt is on the way.

Readers: Would you like your own Reliabilityweb.com Elements T Shirt?  Click here to send your Maintenance-Tip

Previous tip: Reviewing Critical Spare Parts
Next tip: PDCA – Plan Do Check Act

« Back to all maintenance tips

Comments (1)

  • Thanks to Mr. Mark for opening a practical case. Here author thrusts upon enhancing human reliability to strengthen equipment reliability so that it can be put under the tab of “run to failure" category.
    I would like to add that while clustering "run to failure" equipments, utmost attention must be paid on failure effects and MTTR of equipment.
    The equipments if fail, do not pose threat to safety, pollution, production and can be repaired at a lesser cost and time compared to the cost and time required for PDM or PM programs, are ideally fit for "run to failure category"
    Regards
    Sourav Kumar Chatterjee
    Chief Manager Rotary
    HPCL Mumbai Refinery
    India

    1) Posted 10:20 pm, 04 July 2010 by Sourav Kumar Chatterjee

Have your say

Comments are moderated prior to publication.
Please fill out the fields below.
Email addresses will never be published.

Comment guidelines

You can use basic HTML (a, strong, em, blockquote).
Links automatically use the nofollow attribute.
Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted.

Advertisement